_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO3788-13
9 June 2014
This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction
of Naval Record (DD Form 149).
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory
opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) 1910
MMSR-3 of 18 Feb 2014 and HOMC memo 5420 MMEA of 25 Apr 2014,
copies of which were previously provided to you, and which are
now enclosed, The Board also considered your response to the
advisory opinions.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinions. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
ra correction of an official
Consequently, when applying fo
Licant to demonstrate the
naval record, the burden is on the app
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. 2SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR876 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Because of a civil court case Secretary of the Navy was directed to reconsider his decision made in the Records (BCNR) to consider your case regarding your forced retirement per the FY09 Colonel SRB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1288 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your navai record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0261 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dtd 1 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8499 13
You requested removing the fitness report for 14 February to 10 June 2011 and your two rebuttals, each dated 8 June 2011, to the service record page 11 ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 25 May and 1 June 2011, respectively. Rh three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. Since the Board found insufficient grounds to remove either of your failures of selection for promotion, it had...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3990 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board ‘prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3184 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, yegulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6870 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1660 RCT of 6 May 2014, a COpy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014, and which is now enclosed. ra correction of an official Consequently, when applying fo naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7884 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on § January 2015. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board dated 18 June 2014, the e-mail from HOMC dated 7 July 2014, and the advisory opinions from HOMC dated 2 September and 6 October 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8783 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1070 MIQ dated 18 March 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6869 14
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1600 RcT of 5 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014 and again on 5 June 2014 to...